There are few areas of our lives that cannot be facilitated by smart phones. Whether it be keeping in touch with loved ones, travelling, or leaning something new – there is probably an app for it. We frequently upgrade our software and phones to enhance our experience, but could these technologies serve a greater purpose?
Wider applications to Emergency Preparedness?
Given how accessible smartphones are, it makes sense to question whether they could play a part in how we plan for and respond to emergencies. To set up a new detection point in a particular area could be as simple as buying and fitting smartphones in early warning to protect assets such as hospitals, schools, nuclear power plants (NPPs) and other high hazard industries. A mesh of such sensors could be set up for SMRs which might be deployed in traditionally remote locations. Additionally, receiving a 10 second warning of an incoming earthquake could play a significant part in transport industries such as aviation and rail – trains could be slowed down and prevented from entering bridges or tunnels, and planes could have their landings or take-offs postponed.
Shifting from industries to individuals, users could have the option to opt-in for their location to be shared with emergency services in the event of an earthquake, allowing emergency services to locate those who need help. Crowd sourced data could therefore be highly accessible and used to aid populations across the world, offering widespread benefits and potentially preventing numerous injuries and damages.
Another way in which crowdsourced data could influence our emergency planning is by monitoring how we respond to these events. For example, we may not always follow the correct evacuation procedure when in a high-stress situation. If smartphones can track our movements, we could determine if there is a common way in which groups evacuate that deviates from procedure and use this data to develop optimal response plans based on real behaviour.
An obvious downside is that the time to react to an alert is incredibly short, which leads us to question whether it would have a practical use in emergency response plans. For example, if a NPP were to commence shutdown procedures upon receiving an emergency alert, the response might only be effective if triggered automatically. Removing operator involvement raises some issues:
emergency alerts are undoubtedly useful for individuals, even if those 10 seconds are only used to mentally prepare for what is to come. Applying this technology to high hazard industries and adapting our emergency response plans to use these alerts could have an array of advantages. However, it would require careful risk management to ensure we maximise the benefits it offers.
CRA is the integrated risk and safety specialist. For over 20 years, CRA has been supporting operational leaders and technical directors working in critical national infrastructure sectors including Nuclear and Defence with working spanning projects in the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
We offer our clients a unique integrated offering featuring Security and Resilience, Safety Cases, Probabilistic Risk Models, Human Factors and Engineering Substantiation. This provides a 360-degree view of risk, with which CRA can offer robust solutions and distribute essential knowledge and training to clients’ teams, enabling them to operate under optimum safety conditions.
Our specialist team of security and resilience practitioners have experience across a range of sectors performing reviews of security and resilience, helping organisations to make effective and enduring improvements.